Autocratic Leadership Definition, Pros, Cons, and Tips
Have you ever noticed that no two leaders are identical in their approach to running a team or organization? The fact is that there are many different styles of leadership and the style you choose can have a tremendous impact on your effectiveness as a leader. Of course, good leaders try to learn as much as they can about these different leadership styles so that they can incorporate the best features of each into their own approach to leading a team or company. Take the autocratic leadership style, for example. How much do you know about it?
In this post, we will examine the autocratic style of leadership in greater detail, considering its defining characteristics, pros, and cons. You’ll also see when and how to use it to your advantage. We will also consider some historical examples of autocratic leaders and provide some tips to help you include this leadership style on your resume.
Characteristics of autocratic leadership
That autocratic leadership model doesn’t always receive a lot of attention in the business world, due to its centralized approach to decision-making. These days, other leadership styles seem to get all the attention, as companies and entire industries promote a more free-flowing dynamic in the workplace that enables everyone in an organization to offer input. In short, the autocratic approach to leadership is often stereotyped as nothing short of dictatorial control.
In fairness, though, there are a whole host of companies and industries that benefit from a leadership style that emphasizes top-down control of decisions, the main characteristic of autocratic leadership. This is true for organizations that have highly structured environments, depend on strict adherence to rules and processes, and require little or no stakeholder input.
Pros and cons of autocratic leadership
While autocratic leaders are often caricatured as tyrants, that may not always be the case. And though this style of leadership has fallen out of vogue in recent decades, it can still offer a ton of advantages for those who utilize it in a careful and considered manner. Of course, it also comes with potential disadvantages, so it is important to understand both the pros and cons if you want to successfully incorporate any aspect of autocratic leadership into your management style.
Pros of the autocratic leadership style
Below are some of the most advantageous aspects of this leadership style:
Clear direction
When decisions are made by one person, there is less opportunity for confusion about individual assignments, responsibilities, or accountability. A strong autocratic leader can ensure that everyone understands the plan, their individual roles, and management’s expectations. This can allow everyone to focus on getting things done rather than expending time and energy trying to decide how to approach the problem.
Well-defined structure
An autocratic approach to leadership also provides a clear structure for everyone in the organization. There are well-defined roles for every member of the team, along with rules and processes that govern how everything gets done. On top of that, you’ll find performance metrics that help employees understand whether they’re meeting productivity goals. These structural elements can help companies to maximize their efficiency by leaving all complex decisions in the hands of a single leader.
Quicker decision-making
Many other styles of leadership involve complex decision-making structures that encourage input from other stakeholders. Often, there is an attempt to reach a consensus to ensure that the best ideas from every member of the team have a chance to impact the final decision.
That approach can take time, however – time that may not always be available when decisions need to be made quickly. When a single person is in charge, that decision-making can be expedited. An autocratic leader can simply make the decision without any other input, ensuring that processes and projects continue to proceed without unnecessary delay.
Cons of the autocratic leadership style
As you might expect, this style of leadership can also have its disadvantages. For example:
Negative impact on innovation
Autocratic leaders who fail to keep pace with changes in their industry may be resistant to change. That lack of flexibility can cause companies to lose their competitive advantage over time as leadership refuses to innovate and adapt to new technologies, processes, and market conditions.
Lowered morale and employee engagement
Employees who work in companies governed by autocratic leadership may not always feel as though their ideas and input are appreciated. Over time, that can lead to a decline in morale, reduced employee engagement, and higher turnover. There can even be a reduction in productivity among the employees who stay in their jobs.
Reduced collaboration
When decisions are all made at the top of an organization, there is little room for employees to use their own initiative or even collaborate with others to solve problems. Instead, employees can be reduced to nothing more than cogs in the company machine, just going through the motions of their assigned duties each day. The loss of a sense of collaboration and opportunity for individual initiative can have a seriously negative impact on any company’s culture.
Examples of autocratic leadership in action
Obviously, we wouldn’t be addressing this style of leadership if it didn’t have its place in society and the economy. The fact is that there are many different types of organizations that can and do benefit from a more autocratic leadership style. For example:
Law enforcement: Because policing requires strict adherence to rules and processes and reliance on a hierarchy for decision-making, the autocratic leadership style can be highly effective for managing any law enforcement organization.
Military units: Every branch of the military relies on a hierarchical command structure, with subordinates expected to follow their superiors’ orders without question. Without that discipline and command structure, no military can effectively achieve its goals.
Manufacturing: Given that manufacturing remains one of the most dangerous industries for workers, it is not surprising that many companies rely on some version of autocratic leadership to enforce policies and procedures. This top-down approach to management and leadership helps to ensure that workers remain productive without jeopardizing their safety.
Healthcare: Nursing has traditionally been one of those industries where autocratic leadership is common. While there have been efforts to improve staff empowerment in nursing, this style of leadership continues to be used by many hospital administrators.
Famous examples of the autocratic style of leadership
Despite the negative connotations associated with this style of leadership, there is little doubt that many business leaders have managed to find success with some version of the autocratic approach. Below are several examples of leaders who have successfully used this top-down approach in their own business empires.
Elon Musk (X, SpaceX, Tesla)
No matter what anyone might think of Elon Musk, one thing cannot be denied: he continues to be one of the most successful entrepreneurs in the history of the world. He is also well known for his autocratic approach to decision-making, his keen attention to the products his companies build, and his insistence on ensuring that his employees adopt his vision. One of the keys to Musk’s success as an autocratic leader has been his ability to combine that approach with a visionary style of leadership.
Jack Ma (Alibaba)
The founder of Alibaba, the giant Chinese multinational tech firm, has often been criticized for his alleged autocratic leadership style. His insistence on top-down decision-making, resistance to transparency, and reported focus on micromanaging his operations enabled him to exercise near-total control over every aspect of the company. It also helped him to amass a net worth estimated at $34 billion.
Martha Stewart (Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia)
A public name for many decades, Martha Stewart has utilized her own unique brand of autocratic leadership to build a retail empire. Often noted for her admirable attention to detail, Stewart’s success has demonstrated how a top-down approach to business can work when a leader understands how to combine the best elements of the autocratic model with empathy, vision, and a relentless focus on customer satisfaction.
How to successfully utilize autocratic leadership
As you can see, there are times when at least some level of autocratic leadership can help a company achieve its goals. However, adopting a strictly authoritarian approach to leadership can be risky in most situations. That’s why most successful leaders who apply the autocratic model typically blend elements of other leadership styles into their approach.
For example, you may want to consider seeking employee input on a regular basis so that your employees feel more engaged in the company’s decisions. That doesn’t mean that you must adopt all their ideas, but it will at least ensure that you remain in touch with their sentiments. You should also try to ensure that your communications with every employee are based on empathy and the best interests of your team.
Remember, most of the negatives associated with autocratic leadership involve a lack of employee engagement and a sense that management doesn’t appreciate what they do. If you can work to ensure that every team member feels appreciated and valued, they will be more likely to want to follow your lead, even if you maintain tight control over decision-making and the direction of the organization.
When to use autocratic leadership – and when to avoid it
And now the big question: when should you incorporate autocratic leadership into your style, and when should you avoid it? The good news is that the answer to this question is relatively straightforward:
When you’re leading an organization that demands strict adherence to rules and a simple command structure, the autocratic leadership style offers clear benefits.
If you’re heading up an organization with high turnover, some level of autocratic control can help to ensure consistency in productivity and efficiency.
If you’re leading a team or company that relies on innovation and collaboration to achieve its goals, then you should consider another leadership style that enables you to obtain greater engagement from your team.
How to highlight autocratic leadership on your resume
You might also wonder how you can highlight your autocratic style in your resume. Well, the first thing you want to do is avoid any direct description of yourself as a top-down leader. That could raise concerns with prospective employers, especially if they are resistant to that style.
A better way to showcase your style is to simply focus on skills and traits that help you enjoy success as an autocratic leader. For example, you can highlight skills like decisiveness and your focus on achieving results. Other skills that you’ll want to highlight include your ability to leverage clear communication channels, your dedication to meeting expectations, and your overall consistency as a leader.
By focusing on these skills and character traits, you’ll present yourself as a strong leader who gets results, without describing yourself as someone who relies on being the sole decision-maker. That can be especially helpful if you’re applying for a position that involves being someone else’s subordinate.
Alternative leadership styles
As we mentioned earlier, there are other leadership styles too. To successfully incorporate autocratic leadership into your style as a leader, you should make sure that you learn as much about those other options. The most successful autocratic leaders also mix elements of those styles into their autocratic approach. For more information on the democratic, bureaucratic, laissez-faire, visionary, transformational, and other styles of leadership, and tips on how to choose the right one for you, read:
Tips You Can Use to Choose the Right Leadership Style for You
Use your autocratic leadership skills to advance your career!
If you lead an organization that needs a well-developed structure or streamlined decision-making process to be effective, then some variation of the autocratic leadership style may be a good option. If you choose that leadership style, though, you need to be aware of its weaknesses and do everything you can to mitigate any potential disadvantages associated with leading in this way. The best advice is to learn as much as you can about every leadership style to ensure that your approach to leadership incorporates the best elements of each.
Need help highlighting the best features of your autocratic leadership style? Get a free resume review and assistance from our team of resume experts today!
Recommended reading:
10 Examples of Negative Behavior in the Workplace and Tips for Dealing with It
Interpersonal Skills Can Give You the Competitive Career Advantage You Need